To what extent is the personal thinking more reliable than shared Essay

To what extent is the personal thinking more reliable than shared knowledge for decision making - Essay Example Personal knowledge can only be reliable when the objective or the aim is not broad. When an individual is working alone, there would be less of influence in decision-making, making the scenario more comfortable. Again, lone thinking can save time since there would be no need for discussions or consultation. T provides a situation where someone feels settled and can come up with mature conclusion without further influence. However, the knowledge achieved or shown cannot be compared to the extend through which the situation could be if the knowledge was to be shared. For instance, during an examination, the best way to test certain area of thinking is through taking certain task individually. Examiners set tasks to try on levels of personal knowledge, which can only be tested while alone. Therefore, although, knowledge bring out more advantages while shared, it primary structure or basics are related to personal knowledge. Without individual knowledge, there would be poor shared knowle dge. Another example of benefits of individual thinking is that, it would be easier to look at or see the weaknesses and improvise the best strategies to correct those issues. For instance, a tribe, community, society or even a country can only have one leader. Although there are others, basically, the knowledge of that single leader would determine the developments and guidance within the country. The leader serves as the overall and final decision maker. Therefore, the conditions within that specific leadership empire would be determined by final decision of only one person, the leader. Therefore, personal knowledge might be to some extend reliable. However, shared knowledge bares the largest advantage in decision-making. For instance, from the history, people could provide their territories with security and earn rights to live with